Entourage Paul Tucci
EntourageForum Replies Created
-
Jesse,
Finally, a category here at MIX PROTE-GEOPARDY that I can run the table on!
Let me get right to the point before I veer off on a tangent… What you’re hearing, if you have but one monitor, is by definition, mono. The musical sources mixed into your monitor mix buss is separate from what drives the two channel (or more) house speaker system. The panned stereo channel inputs feeding the house system can retain their stereo image but the channel inputs feeding your singular monitor speaker combine to one output signal. Even a stereo source, ie, your backing tracks, become mono when individually dialed into the monitor output buss. Chances are your mixer person du jour is putting equal level of both channels into the monitor buss thinking he or she is doing the right thing.
I’ve been taught a better way and have employed this technique successfully. Instinctively we know this every time we check a mix in mono. When all that luscious stereo spread sound field collapses down to mono, whatever is in the middle of the mix gets a bit louder. We have twice as much of that info in the newly created mono monitor mix now. Both the left signal and the right signal contain audio information about the middle that get added together. Science would say a +6dB change would occur to that middle signal compared to the signals that are hard panned. Those hard panned signals would not combine to a greater than original level because they exist in only one half of the sources to be combined. What I learned to do was combine the two signals, Left and Right, together BUT drop one of them by approximately 6dB. Yes, there’s a level loss to one sides’ content, but the resultant mono signal is far less different compared to an equal level addition that over emphasizes the typical middle panned content of kick, bass, and vocal. It works!
I wholeheartedly agree with Dana’s baller rider suggestion of having two wedges provided in a stereo configuration for you. I also agree with Three 6 Mafia when they said “It’s hard out here for a pimp!”
“I’ll take Rap Lyrics for $600 please Alex.”
-
Jesse, My first reaction when I opened this post was visual. “I know this place!” Sure enough Joshua Tree. It’s a subtle, understated magic that occurs there. And when I listened I recognized the suggestions that took root for you. My chopped up version of thoughts I sent to you turned into fluid music. I love the way you carved out a big space in the middle for just the bass, the drums. and your vocal. It really sounds wide and compelling with the synth/keys off to the edges, like the sky and the horizon out that-a-ways. Mid-Side thinking or processing?? Beyond happy, I’m proud to have helped you, in a small way, to have birthed this baby. I was there for my son’s birth too. Fortunately he did not arrive in a hoodie and a big old beard. 🙂 For your viewing entertainment, there’s a couple of my favorite photos from the visit to the park. Like I said, understated magic happens there if you just tune into it. PT
-
Jesse,
Yes, you have could go harder on the de squeak and still retain all the delicacy of your guitar playing. I would however, avoid de-squeaking the birds. I love the resonant low end that you captured. It adds a second deeper level to the calming and meditative intent of the piece.
Definitely yes to your feathered friends exiting stage right into the reverb.
Well executed!
PT
-
Yea man, attached is the URL to the tool I used though this free version is not frequency sensitive as is the paid version. First one is always free….
PT
https://www.izotope.com/en/products/ozone-imager.html
-
Jesse,
You’re quite welcome. I had a further thought this morning regarding the middle content build up. I would guess that a Mid-Side process would do the trick more elegantly. Process the stereo signal and drop the overall level of the Middle by 6 dB and leave the Side untouched. Voila.
I have a question for you also. Does my gig tomorrow qualify as baller level? MP3 playback for some aspiring dancers who years ago were pooping in their pants. I didn’t think so either. 🙂
PT
-
-
-
Yes, I will repost the screenshot. I wrestled with getting that to save as an appropriate file format and lost. Fortunately I saved the DAW session so it is available.
PT
-
Patrick.
Below are the audio file and a screenshot of the EQ applied to the track. As you listen to the before and after, note the overall tone of the piano. Losing the low mid muck and adding some clarity changes everything. Drastically. The clarity and a sense of openess add happy.
And you thought it was just an EQ tool!
Narrowing the stereo spread to a realistic width as presented here would allow you to place it in a discrete spot within an ensemble setting if that is the vision, or at the very least, prevent the piano from slovenly occupying the entire sonic width.
You a Star Wars fan? Remember that scene when Princess Leia was held captive by Jabba the Hut? Yea, you got the picture?
Use the force for good.
PT
-
Patrick, I think this piano has a whole lotta joy just trying to bust out and tell stories; much like a precocious kid with undiagnosed ADHD. There’s undeniable infectious enthusiasm presented by the sound of the piano, the song choice, and your playing. It’s a strong character. To help that “Voice” speak more clearly, I did a little EQ. A high pass filter, two cuts, and a high shelf as shown in the attached screen shot. To my ear, that cleaned up the low end and allowed the piano to speak more articulately without crossing over into unnaturally bright for an old time piano. The biggest improvement occurred when I tamed the big S T E R E O S P R E A D that your mic placement caused. I mono-ed everything below 1K ish but kept your hard panning intact to leave some tasteful width. I have an ‘Imager” plug in that made quick work of that. The piano now speaks with a focused voice and is a more transparent storyteller because of these changes to my ear. Some Mid-Side micing voodoo might get you there also. I’ll leave that discussion to others. -PT
-
-
Nathan, Oh hell yea! I put my cans on, closed my eyes and went for the ride your composition offers the listener. Even though I knew the drums were coming eventually, when they entered I involuntarily gasped. Originally I said I didn’t mind the drums poking out as they did. I very much like that shock value in a live audio presentation. That’s where my perspective has been for decades so I’m comfy there. Comparatively, the recording world is so nuanced. One has to fit all that sound in a little speaker. Fortunately, you get many attempts to refine the presentation. I think your compositional skills are so strong, and your layering subtle. I have learned something about my own self from interacting with the community conversation of the piece. Thanks. Are you familiar with nitrous-oxide? Not the recreational usage, that;s none of my business. Rather the use as an accelerant for internal combustion engines. Think drag racing. The entrance of the drums, then choir is a powerful emotional peak of
the song. I was asking myself “Do I want a smidge more vocal or just
the tonality of the vocal to match the drums and strings/synth?” I think the choir entrance with either the high end character of the strings would light the rocket even more so. PT -
I read it on the internet.
-