<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>MIX PROTÉGÉ | Daniel Smidak | Activity</title>
	<link>https://mixprotege.com/members/dalliance/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://mixprotege.com/members/dalliance/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Daniel Smidak.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 08:59:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.21.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">118213f4c3f9413aff8be933c9c56f80</guid>
				<title>Daniel Smidak replied to the discussion Mastering Limiter Lookahead time in the forum Mixing</title>
				<link>https://mixprotege.com/forums/discussion/mastering-limiter-lookahead-time/#post-11240</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:46:03 -0700</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://mixprotege.com/forums/discussion/mastering-limiter-lookahead-time/#post-11240"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Mastering Limiter Lookahead time</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thanks for taking the time to share your workflow Dana, very appreciated. </p>
<p>So it took me a while to actually understand PRO L2 properly because it is a sort of three-step processor. The lookahead prepares the transients to be affected by the clipping limiter (attack) and release does what an actual release does depending on how much attack there&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2153"><a href="https://mixprotege.com/forums/discussion/mastering-limiter-lookahead-time/#post-11240" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">99f7dc8452a6ec25be54f666d71b834c</guid>
				<title>Daniel Smidak started the discussion Mastering Limiter Lookahead time in the forum Mixing</title>
				<link>https://mixprotege.com/forums/discussion/mastering-limiter-lookahead-time/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:40:37 -0800</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://mixprotege.com/forums/discussion/mastering-limiter-lookahead-time/">Mastering Limiter Lookahead time</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi Dana, I wanted to ask you about your approach to lookahead in fab filter pro l2. I find that it kills transients quite a bit if pushed beyond 0.3 ish, but on the other hand yields cleaner sound around 1.5ms. Do you have a preference what to go for?</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">14d642fa70f62693dda271b64fbb777a</guid>
				<title>Daniel Smidak updated their profile</title>
				<link>https://mixprotege.com/news-feed/p/540/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:16:39 -0800</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">aff4b1f7dd90cdd52e2c3bab55c67f43</guid>
				<title>Daniel Smidak became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://mixprotege.com/news-feed/p/538/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:15:00 -0800</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		